My pants-no more than $55
Mr. Provis, this is for you.
DC Judge J. Bartnoff ruled against Judge Roy L. Pearson in his pants lawsuit against the Chung dry cleaners. Not only that but she also ruled that Judge Pearson has to pay the Chungs’ court fees. It remains to be seen, however, if Judge Pearson also has to pay the Chungs’ attorney.
In the news broadcast, the Chungs’ lawyer said that he expects Judge Pearson to appeal. My advice to Mr. Pearson is to take it like a man.
Article here.
DC Judge J. Bartnoff ruled against Judge Roy L. Pearson in his pants lawsuit against the Chung dry cleaners. Not only that but she also ruled that Judge Pearson has to pay the Chungs’ court fees. It remains to be seen, however, if Judge Pearson also has to pay the Chungs’ attorney.
In the news broadcast, the Chungs’ lawyer said that he expects Judge Pearson to appeal. My advice to Mr. Pearson is to take it like a man.
Article here.
Comments
@Season: Yes, he is an administrative judge and apparently he has a history of bringing suits up in court. Did you know he sued his ex-wife for spousal support? I don't know if he will be removed from the bench or the bar, but I would think that, at least, no one will want anything to do with him. Who knows, he may not even get reappointed.