An article turned up today in which the Council refused to hear the mayor’s annual budget address. It’s fairly obvious that the council wants to express their displeasure with the mayor—and I’m putting that nicely. However, I think that the Council was wrong to do so. They can hate the mayor all they want. They can employ everything in their arsenal to boot the guy out of office, but they need to do city business. Like it or not, Mr. Kilpatrick is still the mayor of Detroit and has duties that he needs to carry out.
One of the more interesting notes to this story is that the City Council may have violated the law by refusing to let Mayor Kilpatrick speak. Michigan has a law call the Open Meetings Act. Generally speaking, under this act, public bodies that make decisions on policy must do so in a meeting open to the public. Apparently the Council President called up the members individually to take a vote on whether or on not to accept the mayor’s budget proposal and whether or not they should allow the mayor to make his presentation. Under the Act, a public body such as the City Council has to make their decisions in a public meeting. According to the Free Press article, the council voted to adjourn the meeting in which the presentation was to be made but that is separate from the decisions to 1.) accept the budget and 2.) deny the mayor his chance to make a presentation.
Do I really think that things are going to go anywhere with Open Meetings? No. I don’t think that it’s really worth the time.
*photo from the Detroit Free Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment